Blog

Image: Paying the Price for Immigration to the UK

20/12/2019

Robert Swinfen reflects on the price of the ‘privilege’ of coming to the UK, dispelling some myths about people seeking to live in the UK.


Most people don’t realise that it is not only people applying to come to the UK who have to pay fees to the Home Office. A significant number of people who are already in the country legally are subject to what I believe is an increasingly unreasonable fee regime.
 
This affects anyone who has “limited leave to remain”. They must renew their legal status, often as frequently as every 2.5 years. As well as the Home Office fee they have to pay the NHS surcharge of £400 per person per year. The political justification for the surcharge is that those subject to it have not “contributed” – but they are already here paying tax like everyone else. For a family with three children that’s more than £10,000 every 30 months, or £4,000 a year for ten years, until they have been here long enough to apply for “indefinite leave to remain”.
 
Many fees have risen tenfold in the last decade. The Home Office argues that, this way, migrants can fund the entire borders and immigration system without the need for British taxpayer contributions. But the government publishes the actual cost to the Home Office of processing of each type of application, so we know there’s a profit from each fee. For ‘Leave To Remain’, the profit is £900, for ‘Indefinite Leave’ it is £2,000.
 
A decade ago, fees were much more affordable and our immigration system was no less functional. Other European countries have much lower fees. But the Home Office has rejected even the smallest concessions to fairness suggested in an April 2019 report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration on the Home Office's politics and practices on immigration fees.
 
Most people in this situation are already poor, and many are under “no recourse to public funds” conditions that mean they can’t access benefits. They end up with several jobs to feed and house their families while also saving for these huge fees. Many parents have to choose between feeding their children and maintaining their right to stay. Others are never able to claim their rights - priced out of citizenship, often priced out of legal status. Most in this situation are women, especially BAME women. 
 
Many families suffer mental and physical health problems as a direct result of the financial pressure. Thousands of couples and families are being kept apart by the extortionate costs. The stress puts severe and lasting strain on relationships.
 
One lady, who must pay to renew her legal status every two and a half years, says: “We are living below the poverty line in a developed nation while trying to save money for the home office fees, but still never afford to meet the target. Everyone I have spoken to had to borrow money to pay or delayed to pay the fees for the home office.”
 
My question to the new government’s Home Office is - how about a fair system that cares for people, not profit?


Image: No Selfies Please

13/12/2019

Marian Pallister, vice chair of Justice and Peace Scotland, reflects on a new 'selfie' phenomenon and the seemingly forgotten church teaching of Matthew 6:3-4.


How very sad that Glasgow’s night shelter had to post on social media that it wasn’t actually necessary to take a selfie when you decide to ‘help’ the homeless. The speech marks are theirs, and it speaks volumes that this extra touch of irony was added by an organisation that brims over with generosity.
 
Social media can be such a force for good – it can, for example, let people in crisis know where the night shelter van is going to be at weekends – as well as the growing aggressive force we have seen in politics and public life.
 
But to posing for a selfie of your donation to a rough sleeper (A coffee? The remains of your kebab? A woolly hat?), and posting on Twitter or Facebook surely does nothing for your own dignity and can only disrespect the recipient.
 
According to Matthew 6:3–4, Jesus said that when we give to the needy, the right hand shouldn’t know what the left hand is doing. Nor, indeed, He said, should we blow our own charitable trumpet. I think that had Instagram been around at the time, He might well have added that we shouldn’t take a selfie of ourselves giving to the needy and post it for the world to marvel at our act of charity.
 
It seems to be a sad symptom of today’s need for self-affirmation. Here is my perfect life: my perfect children in their perfect clothes; my perfect pet doing the cutest of tricks; my perfect meal in the coolest eaterie in town. And in case that doesn’t make me perfect enough, this is me handing over a doggy bag of my left-overs from that cool eaterie to someone who isn’t as perfect as me.
 
I’m being hypocritical, of course. I’ve donated, for instance, to causes on line and let them display my name. Most of us could probably tick the guilty box in allowing not just the right hand but a whole load of folk know that we are buying a ‘real gift’ from SCIAF or planting a tree in the Caledonian forest instead of giving Cousin Jim the usual scarf and gloves and our bestie a bottle of bubbly for Christmas.
 
I suppose it’s the competitiveness of ‘selfie giving’ that feels like the last straw in social media self-indulgence. Social justice seeks equality for everyone. And if we can’t make that an equality of wealth, we must surely let it be an equality of dignity, respect, and self-worth.
 
The Nativity scene was set in a stable because the Holy Family had nowhere else to go. They were soon to be refugees, fleeing from injustice. Shepherds and kings knelt at the cradle – their gifts given with respect.
 
One of Mother Teresa's favourite texts was ‘Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me" (Matthew 25:40). I’m with the night shelter people in thinking that the selfie takers attack the dignity of a brother or sister.
 


Image: Calais Red Calais White Calais Blue

06/12/2019

This week our blog is a reflection on the refugee and migrant situation in Calais by Alex Holmes.


Calais Red. Washed red trainers tucked into the rotting tree stump, red Berbere spice, red Harissa, the hot chili pepper paste in a large tub at the food distribution – ‘but too much,’ says Yonas, ‘is bad for the stomach’.
 
Gebre shows me his cracked phone screen. “The CRS* he hit me and broke the screen. He hit my friend too, in the face.” He points to his nose. “Blood, too much blood.”
 
A red candle burns, a red sanctuary light, signifier of God’s Presence.
 
The fumes of a makeshift heater killed a young Nigerian exile. His orange tent is now a small shrine, red sanctuary light burning, a dozen small candles flickering. His photo is set into a shallow wooden box. Nearly midnight, and among the dark shapes of small tents, dying fires, dripping black trees, there’s an intense, sad silence.
 
White on red - the No Entry sign near the stadium where Eritrean Orthodox Christians meet for prayer. A wooden cross, a rosary and a small icon of the Theotokos, Mary, the God-bearer, with the Child Jesus are bound to the signpost. A tarpaulin is laid on the cold tarmac, shoes are removed, heads bared, and the young men listen attentively to the Eritrean deacon’s words. As he speaks, a white minibus parks twenty metres away. A CRS officer winds down his window and films.
 
More white. The whites of eyes veined red from exhaustion. A white full moon. Breakfast before Sunday prayers. On the fire, steam rising from a white circle of milk. The Sunday sun bleaching white the two deacons’ prayer shawls.
 
Tall poplars shedding their late season blackened leaves cloak the small encampment where we meet. After weeks of persistent rain, a lake has formed close to the camp. The half dozen tents are raised on pallets. Woldu, in his perfect white shoes, balances on a section of pallet that acts as decking to his tented home.
 
“I clean my shoes every day,” he says.
 
We go to another Eritrean camp. Semere attempts to light a fire, but the wood is wet. By burning white plastic jerry cans and dousing the wood with cooking oil, the fire comes to life and Tesfay starts preparing a meal, but the acrid fumes of burning plastic sting the eyes.
 
The flames light up the blue tarpaulins that protect sagging tents from the rain. A discarded blue camping mat floats on the large puddle beside the tents. It’s cold and damp. Birhan wears blue flip-flops. The only shoes he has – no socks.
 
Aziz, on the other side of the fire, was badly beaten three nights previously.
 
“Four white guys got out of a car. They kicked and beat me and took my phone. I’m ok. But - there are good and bad people in Eritrea too.”
 
Beside me at the fire is Fessehaye. He locates Calais on Google maps then he moves the across the Channel. “Small, small distance,” he says. He then flits across the world to Eritrea, opens his photos and there he is, in a boat on an absurdly blue sea, smiling in the bright sunshine. Blue.
 
Red, white and blue.
 
Tesfay looks up from his cooking at the passing lorries, the only means these exiles have to cross the Channel and seek asylum in the UK.
 
“Getting to UK is too hard now. It’s Mission Impossible,” he says. Somehow he manages a smile.
 
*CRS: Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (the French riot Police)



Page 31 of 87First   Previous   26  27  28  29  30  [31]  32  33  34  35  Next   Last