Blog

Image: "EARLY AND UNJUST DEATH": GUSTAVO GUTIERREZ AND THE PREFERENTIAL OPTION FOR THE POOR

04/06/2021

In this week's blog, 'Early and Unjust Death', Honor Hania reflects on Fr Gustavo Gutierrez and the significance of his preaching on the Preferential Option For the Poor.


"To be poor is to be familiar with death. It is very easy to see these things when we are working with poor persons. They speak with familiarity about death, the deaths of children or other persons because it is so frequent. Certainly, death is one aspect of human life, but I am speaking of early and unjust death. Poverty means physical death due to hunger, diseases and other factors. The poor are familiar with these other aspects of death".  Gustavo Gutierrez

Fr Gustavo Gutierrez, the renowned Peruvian theologian, often uses the phrase "early and unjust death." It was a way of explaining simply the dire effects of poverty on people's lives. Occasionally he uses it to describe the catastrophic consequences of the Spanish conquest of Peru on the indigenous people- disease, malnutrition etc. - but more often he is referencing poverty today and its unavoidable, stark outcome: death. 

Gutierrez did not view poverty as inevitable. He considers it the result of structural injustices that leave people in sub-human conditions, hardship, sickness and deprivation, while others enjoy massive riches.

His proposal  is the adoption of what has become known as the 'Preferential Option for the Poor.' In essence, this means that in any given circumstance, we need to think first of the effect on the most vulnerable. It acknowledges that there are people who are without the necessities of life and that their condition is urgent; therefore, a conscious attempt must be made to try to improve their situation:  we must 'take a Preferential Option' on their behalf; they are in special need, and therefore have a particular claim on Christians.

The point is not that the poor are better people or more loved by God, but simply that they are in circumstances which require urgent attention. Gutierrez puts it this way: 'The very term preference obviously precludes any exclusivity; it simply points to who ought to be first – not the only –objects of our solidarity.' Pope St. John Paul II expressed this as 'primacy.' He wrote, 'This is a Preferential Option, a special form of primacy in the exercise of Christian charity…' (Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, parag. 42). 

Gutierrez challenges the Church to take up this Preferential Option. "Poverty is the threat and the reality of an unjust and early death….The issue is not whether the Church has other goals, other ends; the issue is whether the Church will announce life, announce the Resurrection, be a witness of this definite love in history. And poverty is a big challenge today to this announcement."

Fr Gutierrez will celebrate his 93rd birthday on 8th June. We wish him health and happiness and continued strength to preach the Preferential Option.

 

-------------------------------------

Quotations from: “Theology from the experience of the poor : a talk delivered by Father Gutierrez at the 1992 Convention of the Catholic Theological Society of America in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.



Image: Catholic Social Teaching: From the Global to Local Praxis

28/05/2021

This week in our blog Duncan MacLaren gives a facinating insight into his life, having lived in many different countries, experiencing different cultures and problems including here in Scotland where he has been inspired to join his local community council to help create a just society. 


There are many ways to turn interest in Catholic Social Teaching into a loving praxis that transforms people and ultimately the world. Many people are put off by politics even though it is really the way we construct a just society – or don’t! Being involved in party politics means making compromises and occasionally going against what you regard as the common good if there is a clash between your faith-filled beliefs and the secular pragmatism of the Party. One way of being involved in a non-party political way is through working in your local community council. 

I came at this from working in the international development sphere for SCIAF and Caritas Internationalis for a quarter of a century. My work took me to communities in more than seventy countries, most of them in the global South (so-called ‘developing’ countries). Working for and among these communities in countries far from my West of Scotland roots was (and still is) my passion. The background philosophy to such work was the Catholic Social Justice Tradition, and especially the magisterial Catholic Social Teaching. But the question for me was how can you exercise this teaching in your own, pluralistic patch?

When I came back to Scotland at the end of 2013 after eighteen years overseas, I realised that I knew communities furth of our shores better than my local community. To become better acquainted with the issues in my home area, I was urged to join my local community council. That was six years ago and since then I have become the Chair of the Merchant City and Trongate Community Council (MCTCC), covering much of the Glasgow City Centre. 

Through my participation in MCTCC, I have been taught the relevance of local democracy and have seen subsidiarity in action. I and my colleagues have been involved in opposing planning which took agency away from local people and veered too much towards the interests of developers whose motives were dominated by profit to the exclusion of decent, affordable housing or a building of beauty. We have tried to remind a Council hungry for funds that ‘development’ does not necessarily mean erecting buildings but also creating green spaces and other areas where we allow people’s wellbeing to flourish.

We have worked successfully with locally elected politicians from across the parties, recognising, at least in our area, their keenness to serve the residential community, albeit with the caveats given above. We have a good relationship with our community police who have to deal with everyone from street people with addictions to more serious, violent crime and everything in between. I have taken a particular interest in the policies around begging and drug issues, knowing that these vulnerable people who may annoy the hell out of you when they approach you in the street for the ‘bus fare home’ but, in the end, require long-term public health assistance, not police enforcement to disappear off the streets for a day or two.

At one of the Community Council meetings, I said to a councillor who headed some important committees that affected people’s lives, why don’t you plan for roads, pavements, and buildings through the lens of the most vulnerable? I meant, for example, people with disabilities, the less mobile around us, young mothers with large prams, people with visual impairments, people who are strangers in the city. They are usually an afterthought on a Council checklist rather than being at the forefront of development and planning thinking. That way, we would ensure that we would develop the City for everyone, almost automatically.

The Councillor looked at me with some astonishment but perhaps a seed had been planted in his efficient mind and change might happen with solidarity, the common good and the option for the poor becoming, perhaps not the terms used, but the ethical philosophy permeating the planning and development processes. That is perhaps one small way of coming closer to achieving the Beatitudes at a very local level in our communities, and using Catholic Social Teaching principles to guide our praxis.

For more information on community councils, see
 https://www.communitycouncils.scot/. 

Dr Duncan MacLaren KCSG was Executive Director of SCIAF and Secretary General of Caritas Internationalis headquartered in the Vatican. He was a Visiting Professor at Australian Catholic University, Sydney and lectured in Catholic social ethics and international development studies. He also coordinated a programme to offer tertiary education to Burmese refugees from camps in Thailand. In Scotland, he is a member of the Bishops’ Committee on Inter-religious Dialogue, a Lay Dominican of many years’ standing and a member of the Order’s International Justice and Peace Commission. As he writes here, he is Chair of the Community Council which covers much of Glasgow City Centre.



Image: The impact of war and becoming a refugee on mental health

21/05/2021

In this week’s blog, Richard Kayumba reflects on mental health week and, in particular, the experience of being a refugee, having to flee your home in search of safety and the impacts this has on mental health.


Wars and becoming a refugee have many consequences on the physical and mental health of civilians and soldiers. ‘Death, injury, sexual violence, malnutrition, illness, and disability are some of the common physical consequences of war, while post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety are the emotional effects.

Many asylum seekers and refugees are survivors or escapee from these traumatic experiences. People escaping from such environment are convinced that when they reach their destinations, they will have a chance to live or to re-build new life and be able to heal these terrible wounds. 

However, nothing torments asylum seekers more than being informed that after their miraculous escape from near death situations, they’re unwanted by the country in which they have sought freedom. These torments are intensified by the anxiety of not knowing the outcome of their asylum application.  This goes from anxiety to depression once they are disappointed with a declined application following countless years of waiting for the Home Office’s decision.

From this stage onwards, a nightmare begins for asylum seekers, due to the inhumane treatment received during the time  prior to their deportation. At this stage, asylum seekers are living in extreme fear of what would happen to them once they are deported. At the same time, they are forced to live on the street by not having a place to stay. Also, this is a period when asylum seekers are made to frequent detention centres without committing any crime. To me, asylum-seeking is the worst thing one would wish his enemy and an asylum seeker’s deportation is equal to being sentenced to the death penalty.

One cannot describe how seeking asylum in the UK demolishes life. The  BMC International Health and Human Rights Report   identified 29 studies on long-term mental health with a total of 16,010 war-affected refugees. It revealed significant prevalence rates of depression and anxiety even in long-settled war refugees. Countries studied included Yugoslavia, the Middle East & Africa (Liberia, Somalia, and Sudan.)  Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam). 

‘Whilst preventing war trauma inflicted on refugees may be beyond the control of recipient countries, they can influence the post-migration challenges faced by incoming refugees by improving resettlement policies’, said Marija Bogic & Stefan Priebe, of Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry.

I’m sure that deep down the UK is aware that by refusing to take in refugees, or by reducing asylum seekers to dangers associated with deportation and other inhumane treatment ,she knows it breaches the 1951 Geneva Convention of which she is a party, and that she will change and comply. 

It would be doing a disservice to the Glasgow people who united to save refugees and succeeded against immigration enforcement officials who targeted them if this article ended without applauding their bravery. 
___________________
 1 https://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12914-015-0064-9




Page 7 of 87First   Previous   2  3  4  5  6  [7]  8  9  10  11  Next   Last