Blog

Image: The Nukes of Hazard: The Dangerous Bomb Convoys on our Roads

14/10/2016
Kathleen Summers reflects on a recent meeting

It is, to say the least, disturbing to hear details of Nuclear Weapons Convoys travelling from Burghfield in the south of England to the RN submarine base at Coulport in Scotland. It was, however, no surprise to learn that such convoys present a range of dangers, according to Jane Tallents of Nukewatch


Speaking at an event in Glasgow, she showed such convoys driving along roads alongside normal traffic and even spreading out on motorways. The convoys consist of some 20 vehicles that travel our roads day and night with no identification symbols despite each truck containing up to 8kg of plutonium.

The first three or four warhead carriers are each accompanied by an armed personnel carrier, two blue control vehicles, a fire engine and a variety of police vehicles. There were gasps of horror from the audience when Jane showed a photograph of a warhead carrier that had broken down in front of a house in Helensburgh.

Members of Nukewatch follow these convoys, inform the public and local authorities of their movements and campaign against them. Jane explained that there had been several collisions and other mishaps that Nukewatch knew about and suggested that the communities that the nukes pass through should have a say in this in this procedure.  
Rob Edwards, author of the Nukes of Hazard report, expanded on Jane’s account of the dangers the convoys.  They travel up to six times a year and make a round trip of 900 miles from the south of England to central Scotland. These trips are deemed necessary to maintain the UK Trident nuclear missile system. Despite the hundreds of communities and millions of people potentially affected by the nuclear convoys in the UK, most of us are unaware of the dangers.

An opinion poll commissioned by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons UK and conducted by YouGov, found that 58 per cent of adults were not aware that nuclear weapons were transported on British roads.

The MOD insists that the transports are safe, and sometimes conducts journeys as training exercises. Movements are kept to a minimum necessary to support Trident, according to the Ministry, and an accident leading to a leak of radioactivity is "highly unlikely". The MOD claims " there has never been an accident involving defence nuclear material in the UK that has led to, or come anywhere near leading to, the release of radioactive material to the environment.”

Whether true or not is a matter of trust and judgement. Whether it will remain true in the future is anyone's guess.

Rob Edwards’ report also dealt with the accidents and incidents that have plagued the bomb convoys over the years.  Convoys have crashed, broken down and got lost. Brakes have failed, fuel has leaked, and a range of other mechanical failures have been sustained. Bad luck, poor weather, human error and computer software glitches have all been to blame. Rob demanded more transparency from the MOD, although he said they are more willing to grant information now than they were 10 years ago.

Martha Wardrop emphasised the humanitarian crisis that would happen if there were a serious accident involving a convoy near Glasgow or East Dunbartonshire. An accident could spread deadly radioactive plutonium over a wide area and water would be also be contaminated. The population of these areas is oblivious to this danger.

Following Martha’s thought provoking information, Alison Thewliss MP told the audience that the nuclear convoy was not high on the agenda of the Westminster government despite MPs being aware of the situation. The jobs argument is used to justify Trident’s importance

Brian Quail claimed that trident is illegal, immoral and expensive. He stated there was an international movement to ban the use of nukes. The task now, he said, is to make people more aware of the convoys and the reality of the consequences of an accident en route.


Image: Safe Passage to Europe

11/10/2016
Grace Buckley reflects on a recent meeting of the European J&P network

It seemed a far cry from the trauma of the refugees (mostly Syrian) trapped in Greece that we had witnessed in Athens in April this year to the meeting room on the 8th floor of the modern building which houses the European Parliament, but there was a link.


A number of European Justice & Peace Commissions had felt the need to look critically at the responses of our governments to the "refugee crisis" in the light of the principles of Catholic Social Teaching and to try to formulate an alternative response that would have at its centre the human dignity of each person.

Athens had seemed a good place for us to meet, because the realities of the refugee experience and the impacts of European policy were unavoidable there, as was the evidence of the many kindnesses of ordinary Greeks towards their fellow human beings. Our group comprised representatives both of countries that were the starting point in Europe of the refugees' long journeys to safety (Greece, Malta, Spain) and countries that were their desired ending (Sweden, Netherlands, even Scotland).

We talked and brainstormed, as well as going out and seeing and hearing for ourselves what was happening.  Then we left our brilliant Dutch colleagues to make sense of it all and turn it into a first report. That was how we came to be sitting in a meeting room in Brussels, waiting to meet Kati Piri MEP of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats block, and a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee and the Civil Liberties Committee of the Parliament, to present the report in the context of an expert meeting.

Kati herself is the daughter of a Hungarian refugee and therefore feels a personal interest in the current refugee situation that she described as a shame on Europe.  She listened as Hamada, a Syrian refugee, told of her difficult journey to safety in Holland, our Greek colleague Nikos spoke of the realities of the situation in Greece, and journalist Tina Danckaers described the problems being    experienced in Turkey by refugees.

We also heard from academic Dr Samuel Cogolati, Sophie Scholten of the Dutch police and Samuel Simon of the IOM, who touched on aspects of European refugee and migration policy and in particular on the recent deal with Turkey, and possible alternatives.
Dutch colleague Sebastian completed the presentations by summarising the issues from our point of view: 

• Europe needs to arrange safer passage for refugees seeking to exercise their rights to claim asylum. 
• The agreement with Turkey is unacceptable as a solution to be used elsewhere, because of the human rights issues which it has raised. 
• We need the countries of Europe to face up to their responsibilities and to share the burdens.

Kati listened courteously and intently.  She did try to defend the arrangements with Turkey, pointing out that things were improving there but we felt that she was taking on board the concerns about human rights violations and the suggestions of alternative actions.  Time will tell and we will be keeping a watching brief.



Image: Seeking Peace & Unity

07/10/2016
A reflection by Marian Pallister

The voices of insularity and intolerance may be in the ascendancy, as Nicola Sturgeon reminded us at the Third Annual Peace and Unity Conference held in Glasgow’s City Chambers recently. The First Minister was far from despondent, however. She praised the major role that faith groups have played in welcoming Syrian refugees to Scotland, and the inclusive and open attitude that is promoting a celebration of diversity.


No-one can pretend that Scotland has cracked the prejudice ceiling, but two recent events suggest that the will to do so is strong.

As well as the Peace and Unity Conference, there were the lectures, delivered in the Trades House of Glasgow, under the auspices of the Scottish Ahul Bayt Society (SABS) in collaboration with the Church of Scotland Presbytery of Glasgow Ecumenical Relations and Interfaith Matters Committee, the Scottish Catholic Bishops’ Committee for Interreligious Dialogue, and the Scottish Episcopal Church’s Committee for Relations with People of Other Faiths.

This was SABS theological forum’s inaugural lecture, entitled ‘Christians and the Muhammadan Covenants’.  The keynote speakers were Dr Anthony Allison of the Bishops’ Committee for Inter-Religious Dialogue, and Shaykh Sayed Ali Abbas Razawi, Director General of SABS. Dr Allison reminded his audience of the Abrahamic tradition shared by Jews, Christians and Moslems and that the Qu’ran calls for dialogue between Moslems and ‘People of the Book’ – Jews and Christians.

The problem today can be what Dr Allison called the Google Bubble, a distorting echo chamber in which people’s own views are reinforced (we’ve all had those ads on the Internet that say ‘If you liked x, why don’t you try y’). This, said Dr Allison, clearly affects our religious literacy, and both Muslims and Christians suffer from it. We become misinformed, too often believing the insidious memes spread about each other’s faiths. Don’t worry – Dr Allison believes the bubble can be burst.

How? Both Dr Allison and Sheykh Sayed Razawi encouraged dialogue and discussion. Sheykh Razawi, however, wanted us to focus on the distinct difference between a covenant and a contract. A covenant is morally binding, offering freedom with responsibilities. A contract contains the element of gain and can be cancelled. A covenant, said Sheykh Razawi, is a moral obligation on people to change, to look after each other. It was this that Mohammed offered to Christians and generously, Sheykh Razawi said it is what he sees ‘being built in Scotland’ – a situation he does not see elsewhere in the world.

That same complimentary tone was adopted towards Scotland at the Third Annual Peace and Unity Conference, organised by Ahl Al-Bait Society Scotland in collaboration with other faith and community groups. Azzam Mohamad, director of Ahi Al-Bait Society, told us not ‘walk away without making new connections’. We didn’t.

Dr Anthony Allison had quoted Hans Küng, the Swiss Catholic priest, theologian, and President of the Foundation for a Global Ethic. Küng said, ‘No peace among the nations without peace among the religions. No peace among the religions without dialogue between the religions. No dialogue between the religions without investigation of the foundation of the religions.’ Now Professor Saied Reza Ameli, Dean of Faculty of World Studies at Tehran University reminded us that minority discrimination can cause majority discrimination. ‘If a minority is insecure, larger society will feel insecure’.

The professor added ‘Justice is the main source of peace’  - an echo of Pope Paul VI, who said ‘If you want peace, work for justice.’ We really do work towards a common goal.




Page 86 of 87First   Previous   78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  [86]  87  Next   Last